Microsoft San Jose
POWER & GRID
Time-to-power · verification · interconnectionPower reality
- ⚠ No public interconnection record for this load — CAISO does not publish large-load requests.
- ⚠ No recorded land acquisition found.
How the time-to-power window was estimated
- Current stage: Announced (furthest stage with documented evidence)[1]
- No public grid record: No interconnection request or utility contract found; adds uncertainty to the upper bound.
- Required: 77 MW
- From “Announced”, large loads have typically taken 2–5 more years to first power (editorial range; see Methodology).
- The window is a range of plausible outcomes under these assumptions, not a forecast. It moves as new filings, queue updates or imagery arrive.
Project verification
- AnnouncedSep 11, 2026
Utility filing / announcement
- Sep 11, 2026 · Planned capacity reported: 77 MW[1]
- Land acquired
- Planning / zoning
- Permitting
- Interconnection application
- Feasibility study
- System impact study
- Facilities study
- Interconnection agreement / service contract
- Financing
- Under construction
- Energization
- Operational
● documented · ◌ implied by a later stage · ○ no evidence found. Dates are those of the earliest dated evidence, which can be later than when a stage actually began. Evidence classes: Utility filing / announcement.
Grid path
- →facilityMicrosoft San Jose
- →substationNot identifiedUnknownUnverifiedNo substation mapped within 3 km and none named in filings.
- →transmissionNot identifiedUnknownUnverifiedNo transmission line mapped within 2 km.
- →
- Substation capacity:
- not published
- Required upgrades:
- not yet sourced
- Congestion:
- not yet sourced (no nodal price data)
Dashed boxes are based on proximity only and do not establish which asset serves the site.
Interconnection records
No interconnection-queue record is linked to this site. Of the ISOs we ingest, only NYISO publishes large-load requests; PJM, ERCOT, MISO, SPP and CAISO queues list generation only.
On-site & dedicated generation
- On-site natural gas generators (backup power, demand response and ancillary services)[1]“77 MW data center includes on-site natural gas generators for backup power and for use in demand response and ancillary services.”Natural gasBehind-the-meterLikely
Location & imagery
County-level (approximate)Location is approximate (county-level (approximate)); the marker does not identify the exact site.
- Coordinates
- 37.23308, -121.69134
- County
- Santa Clara County
No openly licensed ground-level photos matched to this site yet.
Ownership, operation & customers
- 1. Property owner of recordNot identified
- 2. Owner / developerNot identified
- 3. Operator
- 4. Tenant / cloudNot identified
- 5. End customer / workloadNot identified
Each link is sourced separately. The property owner of record is often a special-purpose entity; the same company appearing in two roles is shown only when sources say so.
All parties with evidence
- Utility
“Pacific Gas & Electric Company Microsoft / Data Center San Jose, CA” Listed by EEI under this member utility.
No tenants or end users identified in our sources yet.
Power (all fields)
- Planned capacity
“77 MW data center includes on-site natural gas generators for backup power and for use in demand response and ancillary services.”
- On-site / dedicated generation
“77 MW data center includes on-site natural gas generators for backup power and for use in demand response and ancillary services.”
- Current facility power
- Not yet sourced
Capacity figures are nameplate or contracted; annual consumption is a labeled model estimate, not metered data.
Grid & electricity
- ISO / RTO
Location falls inside this ISO/RTO footprint.
- Balancing authority
Control area of the containing utility territory.
- State avg. industrial price
California statewide average, July 2026.
- State avg. commercial price
California statewide average, July 2026.
- Generation within 50 km
65 EIA-reported plants within 50 km.
- Generation queued in county
6 active generation interconnection requests in Santa Clara County: Storage 823 MW. Queued projects often don't get built.
- Interconnection status
- Not yet sourced
- Contracted / committed power
- Not yet sourced
| Nearby infrastructure | Type | Distance | Voltage / capacity | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metcalf Energy Center · Calpine Corp - Metcalf Energy Center | Power plant (Natural Gas) | 5 km | 557 MW | [6] |
| Sc 1 Data Center, Phase 2 · Xeres Ventures LLC | Power plant (Petroleum) | 26.5 km | 100 MW | [6] |
| Donald Von Raesfeld Power Plant · City of Santa Clara - (CA) | Power plant (Natural Gas) | 28 km | 148 MW | [6] |
| Gilroy Power Plant · Calpine Gilroy Cogen LP | Power plant (Natural Gas) | 29.3 km | 101 MW | [6] |
| Gilroy Peaking Energy Center · Calpine Gilroy Cogen LP | Power plant (Natural Gas) | 29.4 km | 144 MW | [6] |
| Los Esteros Critical Energy Center · Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility LLC | Power plant (Natural Gas) | 30.1 km | 300 MW | [6] |
| Elkhorn Battery Energy Storage System · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. | Power plant (Batteries) | 47.9 km | 183 MW | [6] |
| Dynegy Moss Landing Power Plant Hybrid · Dynegy -Moss Landing LLC | Power plant (Natural Gas) | 48.3 km | 1.77 GW | [6] |
| Largest queued generation in this county | Fuel | Queue status | MW | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEWELFLOWER STORAGECAISO 1553 | Storage | IA signed · proposed 2029-03 | 350 MW | [4] |
| TANAGER STORAGECAISO 1550 | Storage | IA signed · proposed 2027-12 | 200 MW | [4] |
| LOS ESTEROS CRITICAL ENERGY FACILITY EXPANSIONCAISO 378 | Storage | IA signed · proposed 2023-09 | 120 MW | [4] |
| TOKAY STORAGECAISO 1866 | Storage | IA signed · proposed 2030-03 | 100 MW | [4] |
| KIFER BESS 1CAISO 1918 | Storage | In study · proposed 2025-12 | 50 MW | [4] |
| MILPA POWER BANKCAISO 1457 | Storage | In study · proposed 2025-04 | 3 MW | [4] |
Utility, ISO and nearby assets are derived from the site's location. Proximity to a substation or line doesn't establish the interconnection; that needs a utility filing or interconnection-queue record. Queue requests are applications, not commitments — most never reach operation.
Construction & permitting
- Announced—
- Land acquired—
- Permitting—
- Construction start—
- First operational—
- Expected completion—
- Planned capacity
“77 MW data center includes on-site natural gas generators for backup power and for use in demand response and ancillary services.”
Real estate
None sourced yet
None sourced yet
None sourced yet
- Annual property tax
- Not yet sourced
No county parcel or assessor records linked yet. County records are currently ingested for Loudoun County, VA and Maricopa County, AZ.
Size
- Floor area
- Not yet sourced
What changed (last 3 years)
Follow this facility (RSS)No tracked changes yet. Values are recorded on every data refresh, so changes will appear here over time.
Timeline
No dated events sourced yet.
All claims (provenance audit)
10| Field | Value | Source | Confidence | As of | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator | Microsoft | [1] | Confirmed | 2026-09-11 | Shown |
| Utility | Pacific Gas and Electric | [1] | Confirmed | 2026-09-11 | Shown |
| Planned capacity | 77 MW | [1] | Likely | 2026-09-11 | Shown |
| On-site / dedicated generation | On-site natural gas generators (backup power, demand response and ancillary services) | [1] | Likely | 2026-09-11 | Shown |
| ISO / RTO | CAISOCALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR | [2] derived | Likely | — | Shown |
| Balancing authority | CISO | [3] derived | Likely | — | Shown |
| Generation queued in county | 823 MW | [4] derived | Confirmed | 2026-09-27 | Shown |
| State avg. industrial price | 25.11¢/kWh | [5] | Confirmed | 2026-07 | Shown |
| State avg. commercial price | 30.56¢/kWh | [5] | Confirmed | 2026-07 | Shown |
| Generation within 50 km | 3.6 GW | [6] derived | Confirmed | 202502 | Shown |